Teaching as a Subversive Activity cover

Teaching as a Subversive Activity

by Neil Postman & Charles Weingartner

Education should produce crap detectors. Here's how.

For you if

you want the book that most directly argues that education should produce people who can detect bullshit. Written in 1969 and more necessary now than it was then

⚡ Choose Your Route ⚡

Not sold directly on this site. Support indie bookstores with a new copy, or go sustainable with a used one.

Buy New on Bookshop.org

Supports independent bookstores

— OR —

Find Used on Better World Books

Secondhand & sustainable

$17 MSRP
Reference price shown. Other editions may be available.

Postman and Weingartner published this in 1969 with a single argument: the purpose of education should be to produce crap detectors — people who can identify nonsense, propaganda, and manipulation when they encounter it, who ask the questions the powerful prefer not to be asked, who refuse to accept the official version without examination. The most directly punk education book ever written for teachers. Was banned in several school districts. Makes the case that the school system as currently constituted does the opposite of what it claims — it produces compliance, not inquiry; credulity, not skepticism; consumers, not citizens. Postman is already on the P&P shelf through Amusing Ourselves to Death. This is the earlier book and the more optimistic one — not just the diagnosis but the prescription, a set of proposals for what education looks like when it takes its own stated purposes seriously. The book that most clearly states the P&P educational philosophy: the goal is not to produce knowers but to produce questioners.

Where This Book Lives

Related Viewing

Shares a topic, theme, or setting with this book in the catalog.

Most Likely to Succeed poster

Most Likely to Succeed(2015)

dir. Greg Whiteley

The best case for project-based learning, with caveats.

A year inside High Tech High, a San Diego charter school built entirely around project-based learning instead of standardized instruction, following two classes of ninth graders.

Why it’s here: Makes the most vivid case in documentary form for project-based learning over the standard model — but its history of how American schooling got this way has been disputed by actual education historians, and its producers have their own stake in the reform it's arguing for. Worth watching with that critique alongside it, not instead of it.

Letterboxd ↗